patching...
Update: For more local news about the community, follow Fox Point-Bayside Patch on Facebook »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Database: Wisconsin 2012 Campaign Contributions to Obama, Romney

Check out Patch's new interactive campaign contribution database to find out who in your community is contributing to President Barack Obama or Republican challenger Mitt Romney in the 2012 presidential election.

 

See which presidential candidates are getting money from Wisconsin residents with Patch's interactive database of individual contributions made to President Barack Obama and Republican Mitt Romney.

This database includes nearly 18,000 individual contributions Wisconsin residents made to the two candidates from April 1, 2011, through July 31, 2012, the most recent data available.

The data, which is from the Federal Elections Commission, does not include contributions to political action committees or other outside groups.

Related Topics: Barack Obama, Campaign Contributions, Mitt Romney, Searchable Database, election 2012, participate 2012, and presidential election

MacyFray

7:22 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Are you kidding me! Who cares! This is a terrible article and I don't know who thought this would be a good idea especially with all the crazy political loonies in WI lately. I know this is public record but by encouraging this link you are just stirring the pot and not everyone will use this information properly. They may use it against someone. I guess I'm not surprised it came from the Patch. Very unfortunate choice.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Luke

6:06 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

There are other sources of this information. They merely tapped into the database.

Keith Best

7:28 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

We know that Obama has been the empty suit (empty chair) that we who did our homework back in 2008, knew he would be. He is a failure. No "EXECUTIVE EXPERIENCE" has proven to be his downfall. Spending most of his first term blaming his predecessor is not the true mark of a leader.
I proudly donate to Romney/ Ryan for they will get this country back on the right track.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael Schwister

7:43 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Keep trolling Keith Best. Empty brains make statements with no facts and troll for hate and fear.

Comment_arrow

Jim Bob

10:38 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Keith, Obama can't be that bad. He pushed for ObamaCare that was patterned after RomneyCare. If fact, Sunday morning Romney was telling us that, if elected, he plans to keep key parts of ObamaCare.

Much of the first term spending is related to high unemployment and the reduced tax flow from a reduction in profits and income. I've heard both Romney and Ryan say they know Obama inherited a very bad economic situation.

Then of course, there were two wars, that thing in Lybia and the Arab spring stuff in Egypt and Syria. Stuff like that would be challenging to anyone -- even someone with executive experience.

Come to think of it, the Republicans call themselves the "party of Lincoln." If I recall my history, Lincoln didn't have any executive experience. Apparently, "executive experience" is a GOP talking point in 2012. Seems that those running Eron had plenty of executive experience and hand-in-glove ties to President George W. Bush. Remember Bush? Apparently they forget about him at the GOP convention and all the TEA Party rallies I've attended.

Comment_arrow

Chadwick

10:39 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Jim Bob,

So stating that there are good parts to ObamaCare means it's a good bill? Not at all, it's a terrible bill with some small parts that should be kept. Obama inherited a bad economic situation; yes, but he has made it worse and increased the deficit more than all presidents combined before him. "Executive Experience" I think what Keith was stating is that Obama has no experience in the real world; none, zero, zilch. He has never run a company big or small and has no private work experience at all. Obama isn't the worst president, Carter saves him, but he is the second worst president of our country.

Comment_arrow

Jim Bob

11:29 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Chadwick:

Obama has experience working as a community organizers in Chicago. If that isn't related to the real world, I don't know what is.

Can you name me a perfect piece of legislation that has ever been passed into law? Anybody who thought ObamaCare was the end of the story is thinking with a blank slate.

Other than driving the Oscar Meyer Weiner mobile, Paul Ryan has even less real world experience than Obama. Obama also worked at Baskin-Robbins in high school. Ryan's been living on the public teat since graduating from college...actually longer since Social Security paid for his college.

It amuses me that the TEA Party gets an orgasm over Ryan when he is a career politician who voted for baliouts and stimulus money and proposes a budget that would balance around 2050. Go figure...

Hey, you forgot to address the points on the wars and Bush and Bin Laden. Do you GOTears have a collective brain fart when it comes to the cause of the record debt and deficits we are experiencing? Duh, if we start two unfunded wars, and cut taxes, people will have to start wearing hard hats to protect themselves to the increased number of golden eggs falling from the the free-market Golden Goose.

Obama is right when he says the GOP prescription is to give a couple tax cuts and eliminate regulations and everything will be golden. Hey, it didn't work for Bush and he double the national debt. Reagan almost triple the national debt!...you'd call themselve "fiscal conservatives."

Tim

8:39 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Empty brains also make comments like yours mike...so sad.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael Schwister

9:05 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Whats sad Tim is that we can't have policy debates. Both sides cherry pick sound bites and participate in internet road rage. And our "hidden " government pulls our strings to keep us apart. Whats sad is way too many of us aren't engaged in fact finding.

Michael McClusky

8:54 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

It is a good thing to have transparency. It makes the situation a little more honest. Now, if we can only have access to the supporters of the PAC Funds, then we might actually see what the big wheels are up to.

Reply

Bren

9:02 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Unlike Super PACs, to which billionaires may donate in privacy, individuals who donate traditionally to election campaigns are exposed to public scrutiny. The billionaire's names will show up in public record if they make a direct contribution, but with Citizens United they may now donate a modest amount directly, then pour untold millions into organizations like Americans for Prosperity that are working hard to influence elections. Why should a wealthy person be given more opportunities to influence elections than a working or middle class citizen? Repeal Citizens United!

Reply
Comment_arrow

sam

1:28 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

sorry about it Bren, but it IS working class people, not the rich, who are influencing elections. There are a lot of unions at the top of this list....

http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php

Comment_arrow

Tom Kamenick

6:47 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Citizens United upheld disclosure requirements as constitutional.

Tim

9:15 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

I completely agree with your last post mike s...much better approach.

Reply

Carol

10:07 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

So sad that people don't remember that Osama Bin Laden was killed thanks to Obama. Also the 2 wars ended too. If all of you who rip Obama would have been given his job, could you have cleaned up the debt & mess that he was left with??? Get real! Ronmey & Ryan are going to create more problems if they are elected. Running a country isn't easy especially when you come into office with such a big mess!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve ®

12:34 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

I know right. It's all Bush's fault and there is no way this man, who choose to run, knew all of the issues, promised to fix them, won election, could have possibly fixed anything in only 4 years. It's just not fair to blame him for increasing the debt 5 Trillion dollars, or for 86 million people out of the workforce. He did shoot Osama, right in the head! Well not really the Seals did that and they were set up and over there because of Bush.

Oh wait.....

http://tinyurl.com/9v2jaqo

Comment_arrow

Jim Bob

1:29 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Steve, where did you get the 86 million number?

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

1:41 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

underemployment, given up looking, left the workforce, etc. Obama, Obama, Obama!

Comment_arrow

Ed Larson

6:49 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

You're right Carol, Obama has left a terrible mess to clean up.

Jim Bob

10:46 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Here's an interesting short article about Obama and campaign financing in the 2012 Presidential election:

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/08/27/120827fa_fact_mayer

Reply

daniel mayle

12:53 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

im voting for mickey mouse screw em both mit romney is the rich for the rich and he is not interested in helping anything but himself and the rich and obama well he's not so bad i guess but ive heard lots of rumors about a lot of stuff and i dont like that either maybe if politicians would stick to truths and facts and WHY they should be the next president instead of slamming and slandering and railroading eachother we wouldnt have problems

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carbon Bigfuut

2:32 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Dan, can you try that again, in English this time?

Steve ®

1:09 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

OBAMA! OBAMA! OBAMA! change that gets results :)

►Moody’s expects to cut US rating without deal to lower debt/GDP ratio◄

OBAMA! OBAMA! OBAMA!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Bob

1:31 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Steve, from the latest polls, it looks like you'll have four more years to slam Obama.

What do you think the economy would have looked like today had McCain won in 2008?

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

1:37 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

The polls that over sample democrats? mkay

Comment_arrow

Nuitari

4:11 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Jim Bob amongst many others obviously don't understand the day-to-day dynamics of polling, especially after party conventions. Look up polls for Carter and Dukakis and tell me how salty they must have felt blowing their poll leads.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

6:00 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

It's alright, let them live in the polls. It's a much better win when they believe them yet get crushed.

The Donny Show

2:20 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Not sure where this list draws from. There are many, including mine, that are missing from the Romney tally.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nuitari

4:07 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Don't tell anyone, they might think you're rich and hate you.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

5:59 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

I too am missing, but having this list searchable is BS.

Comment_arrow

Jim Bob

9:59 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Nuitari, do you really think it's about hating the rich? For me it's about Romney and Buffet paying 13 percent federal taxes and me and Ryan paying 20 percent. Obviously, the more you income is derived from capital gains, the lower the tax percentatge you pay.

At least Reagan understood this and raised the captial gains tax rate to be the same as earned income. Ryan wants to eliminate capital gains. That would reduce the Romney and Buffet percentages even more.

In my worldview, if Romney pays 13% and I pay 20%, either I should also pay 13% or Romney should pay 20% or we should be paying a percentage somewhere between 13-20%.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

12:04 pm on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Invest your money instead of blowing it on consumer or family goods and you too can pay 13% income tax rates.

There, that was easy

Comment_arrow

Jim Bob

1:47 pm on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Steve, the problem with the economy is that people aren't buying consumer goods. That's what drove the economy up till 2007. The good old days when we had a -20 percent savings rate and anybody without a decent credit rating or a stable job, etc. could get credit cards and buy $350K+ houses when they should have been buying a double-wide trailer.

Reagan was the last President who set the captial gains rate the same as the earned income rate.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

8:55 pm on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

So vote for Obama again to continue the lack of consumer spending. Raising the capitol gains tax does nothing to solve your response. It would only slow the investment into consumer product development.

Comment_arrow

Jim Bob

7:59 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Steve, the hymen of the consumer spending bubble broken when Bush was President. Bush cut taxes, reduced regulations, started two wars, passed Medicare Part D, etc. and the end of his term produced months of hundreds of thousands of jobs being lost. How did this approach help consumer spending? We had a -20% savings rate, i.e. living way beyond our collective means.

Please provide a couple insights into how the R-R ticket will increase consumer spending? The average hourly pay rate has been dropping for years. The average number of hours worked has been dropping to around 33 a week. There are serious issues here that won't be solved by tax cuts, increasing military spending and cutting big holes in the safety net and reducing funding to K-12, college and vo-tech education and training.

R-R don't want to tell us their plan would include eliminating the mortgage deduction, daycare credits, and a whole list of other middle class welfare programs that have made the country what it is today.

The challenges are a little deeper than I suck because I don't support your candidate. The Democrats don't have all the answers nor do the Republicans. The TEA Partiers have big mouths to bully the gutless politicians into their sinkhole of uninformed ignorance. Perhaps we need to grow some ears and start listening to the options echoing from all sides of the debate and discussion. Afterall, that's what politics is about...a thing call compromise.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

11:02 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Prime example of changing the subject. I'll bring it back. You bitched about the capital gains tax. I said you too could "enjoy" the capital gains tax if you would actually invest your already taxed first income. /end

Ann Wright

8:33 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

If you contributed less than $100, you would not be listed in the database. It is imperative to our demoracy to have sites like this where people can see where the money is going and from whom. The WI Democracy Campaign has lots more information to research. Just go to their website. Even with Citizens United, as evil as that decision was, you can still research PACs by asking TV stations for information about who is paying for the ads. An open, accessible government is essential to a democracy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve ®

1:20 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

When the Walker/Barret list was made it showed donations less than $100.

The total limit that you can donate directly to a campaign is so low this list is BS. This is how Obama takes out his competition.

Joseph Robert

8:54 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Yesterday, Paul Ryan said “I will never forget the moment (9/11) that our homeland came under attack.”

So, why did Paul Ryan FORGET 9/11 first responders and VOTED TWICE AGAINST the bill to provide them necessary healthcare, and then he was not present when the third vote PASSED the 9/11 First Responder Healthcare Bill!

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/09/on-eve-of-911-anniversary-paul-ryans-opposition-to-first-responders-bill-revisited/
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/09/11/1130324/-Paul-Ryan-Voted-AGAINST-9-11-First-Responders-3X-Romney-Failed-To-Thank-9-11-First-Responders

Paul Ryan is an EXTREMIST and a liar.

Reply
Comment_arrow

The Donny Show

9:22 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Yeah he is a liar. And a poopy-head too.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

12:05 pm on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Please list everything that was in that bill so we can have an honest look at it.

Comment_arrow

Jim Bob

8:37 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Joseph:

Could you explain the difference between a politician and a liar? I seems to me that that there is one of those oxymorons.

If Ryan is indeed a liar, luckily he is a practicing Catholic and can to to confession every Friday. A week full of lies probably translates into 10 Hail Marys and 10 Our Fathers, which -- if you have attended confession religiously -- can be mubbled quickly between the confessional and the holy water dish on the way out of church.

That is what is called putting God before country.

CentralScrutinizer

9:27 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

@Carol. The chosen one had NOTHING to do with shooting Bin Laden...he was just a puppet in a chair. If that's what you want to hang the hat of liberals on go for it...you people are absolutely shameless. Looks whats happening to US embassy's all over the world...wants The Chosen one do? NOTHING, schedule a night on Leno. Obama is an abysmal failure.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Bob

10:07 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

CS, I believe Carol's point is that the elimination of Bin Laden was accomplished during Obama's watch. Remember when Bush told us "mission accomplished?" Not sure what mission Bush accomplished, but he didn't get Bid Laden, he didn't end the war in Iraq and he forgot about the war in Afghanistan.

You don't have to be an slack-jawed, Fox News-parrotting blowhard to know that - had McCain won in 2008 - he would be trumpeting the killing of Bin Laden.

I'm not sure I heard the Iraq and Afghanistand wars or Bush's or Bin Laden's names mentioned during the GOTea Convention. What give there? You would think two of the major causes of the grwoing national debt would have been spotlighted?

Scott Berg

8:40 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

This page seems to be the model of full disclosure for both presidential candidates. So why are ALL the photos attached (19 of them) pro-Romney?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lisa Sink

9:05 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Great point, Scott. It appears the editor uploaded one image and Patch users uploaded the rest, given our open platform. I've seen this happen on other political stories.

Comment_arrow

Scott Berg

9:46 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

I'm a Romney fan as well, but this isn't a campaign site. Part of Jefferson's concept of democracy was a well informed voter and to me that means two sides (often more!) to every story. The first photo of the two candidates is neutral and looks like your editor's work..

I didn't realize anyone could upload images. Perhaps this says something about the relative competence of the two campaigns?

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

11:04 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

►but this isn't a campaign site.◄
You wouldn't know looking at all the Obama banner ads here.

►says something about the relative competence of the two campaigns◄
liberals do have a harder time at the internet.

Comment_arrow

Jim Bob

11:30 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Steve, I believe Scott's point deals with the pictures that go with the story. He is not talking about banner ads.

If you look at the 19 photos included with the story, they look like they all come from a Romney campaign ad.

If the Patch is actually paid to include those photos with this story, it is rather deceiving to us readers as to the purpose for this story.

Comment_arrow

Nuitari

11:40 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Conservative users love uploading images on this wonderful site. So much better than the editor's. :)

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

11:42 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

You, as a user, can upload pictures to any article you want.

Tom

9:28 am on Friday, September 14, 2012

2012 Election will be one to remember! Yikes!

Reply

Leave a comment