In a December 12th speech at the Town Club in Fox Point, retired Milwaukee Journal Sentinel architecture critic Whitney Gould called the Fox Point Ravine Footbridge “critical to Fox Point’s history, identity, and sense of collective memory” and described the current effort to replace the now-closed bridge as “well worth it.”
Gould, who is now a member of the Milwaukee City Plan Commission, spoke at a gathering attended by over 70 Fox Point residents. The event was intended to support the efforts of Footbridge Friends, a private not-for-profit group raising funds toward construction of a new bridge in a public/private partnership with the Village of Fox Point. Similar events to support the footbridge fundraising campaign are planned for January.
Parks, walking paths, and footbridges are vital civic amenities, Gould said, that “increase the quality of life in communities, add to property values, and help keep population in cities.”
Quoting Frederick Law Olmsted, creator of New York’s Central Park and Milwaukee’s Lakefront Park, Gould argued that footbridges themselves serve as a democratizing force in a community. They literally bridge the gaps between different neighborhoods and “bring people of all ages and social strata together to experience nature,” she said.
Another big fan of footbridges, she added, is Santiago Calatrava, designer of perhaps the most famous museum addition in the U.S., the Milwaukee Art Museum’s Calatrava wing, as well as a footbridge that links the lakefront museum to downtown Milwaukee.
To Calatrava, footbridges are “mystical” creations, Gould said. They provide a “metaphysical experience of being suspended between earth and sky” that transform our understanding of a place.
Despite these benefits, she said, footbridges, parks and walking paths not infrequently encounter public opposition, invariably being characterized as “frills and frivolities” by those not in favor of devoting local government funds to their construction and upkeep.
In the face of such opposition, Gould argued, it’s important to take the long view. She buttressed her argument with a quote from celebrated Victorian art critic John Ruskin, who said, “Let it not be for present delight nor for present use alone. Let it be such work that our descendants will thank us for.”
Gould described the proposed new ravine footbridge design as “simple and elegant,” well-proportioned, nicely detailed, and ideal for its “delicate setting.”
She added, “It will serve the community well for generations to come.”
Hosts of the event at the Town Club were Fox Point residents John and Mary Crichton, John and Mary Emory, Barbara Fuldner, David and Mary Beth Goelzer, Charles and Carol James, Charles and Judy Mulcahy, and Linda Gale Sampson.
Footbridge Friends is a non-profit organization seeking pledges to support a public/private partnership to replace the footbridge that spans the ravine between Bridge and Barnett Lanes. It will be making a report in February to the Village Board about its efforts to collect about $625,000 in pledges.
According to Barbara Schwartz, Footbridge Friends president, all donations of over $1,000 will be noted in a plaque at the footbridge. Any donations over $3,000 can be spread out over a three-year period.
For further information, contact Schwartz at footbridgefriends@hotmail.com or at (414) 446-9501. The Friends group also maintains a Website at www.footbridgefriends.com
Absolutelyfabulous
9:52 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
So, wait a minute...Oh, BTW, Larry Booth...you really don't count going up against Crichton-Big Real Estate owner in Milwaukee/East Side, Emory-Investment Banker, Mulcahy-Corporate Attorney..etc...That is why continually presenting your information at the Village Board meetings was the equivilent of putting a bucket on your head and banging it against a wall. You need to reach the masses/pound the pavement to get the word out and they were/are not at the village board meetings or the Town Club get togethers.
The reason this was not put to a referendum is because a majority of residents would have voted no. Though, the power/business connections do not lie with the majority of residents in Fox Point. So, the few well heeled people are able to fuel the trustees and their continual throwing of money at this bridge effort and ultimately saddle it on the backs of all taxpayers even though a very small percentage of residents even utilize this bridge.
Absolutelyfabulous
10:13 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Part 2
Whitney Gould as your expert on the matter...C'mon.
"Parks, walking paths, and footbridges are vital civic amenities, Gould said, that “increase the quality of life in communities, add to property values, and help keep population in cities." Gould argued that footbridges themselves serve as a democratizing force in a community. They literally bridge the gaps between different neighborhoods and “bring people of all ages and social strata together to experience nature,” she said"
It's not like this footbridge is linking one demographic strata to another in Fox Point Whits. It is buried in the heart of the wealthy part of Fox Point. This footbridge will do absolutely nothing to "help keep any amount of population in Fox Point"
It is a bridge to nowhere and what Whits neglects to mention is the fact that within Fox Point is Doctor's Park and it's numerous trails and access to Lake Michigan as well as the 185 acre Schlitz Audubon and it's amenities PLUS numerous footbridges right next door for all to enjoy as well and more importantly by thousands and thousands of people from ALL OVER each year vs the few and narrow strata of population that utilizes the footbridge.
Whits..If you're committed enough, you can make any story work. Good Job.. Saul Goodman taught you well. 37 second mark
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBeQO1nBThQ
One word..REFERENDUM
Larry..Start pounding the pavement.
Independent Mind
11:39 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
This issue is not about the footbridge. It is about the cost/benefit. The $2.72 million cost of the footbridge equals $1,100 per Fox Point household. How can anyone justify that much money for a FOOTBRIDGE that serves no useful purpose?
justacitizen
11:51 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Independent- obviously you don't know the facts. The bridge is not even CLOSE to the cost you mention if you use any of the numbers that have legitimately been talked about by any of the actual consultants (as opposed to one of the people opposed to the project) . Useful purpose is in the eye of the beholder, and there are people that think that recreation is actually a useful part of their day. Not to mention any tax burdens, greatly reduced by private fundraising efforts, aren't distributed equally among the residents. The people who have the higest value homes have the highest tax burden for any infrastructure improvement- bridge, streets, ice skating rink, whatever you care to look at in ANY part of the village.
Independent Mind
2:41 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Justacitizen...You are the one who doesn't know the facts. The village has already borrowed $1.63 million earmarked for this project. The village is counting on the citizens group to raise another $625,000. Add to that $460,000+ in financing costs. And guess what you get: $2.72 million. All of these figures are from the village's 2013 budget and were confirmed by the Village's Manager, the Treasurer and the Public Works Dir. Now what was that you were saying?